Posts Tagged ‘A Little Help’

Sundance update

December 2nd, 2009

We did not get in.

While disappointing, a festival is not the endgame on this film…theatrical distribution is.

And so we forge on.

12.5 hours left

December 2nd, 2009

So, I don’t expect to sleep tonight. Nor do I expect to be able to concentrate for the morning tomorrow. Tomorrow, at 1pm, we find out about Sundance.

Now, for those of you who don’t know…for the past 5 or 6 years, if you were in Sundance (as a feature), you knew a week or two before. Calls were put out, and you were asked not to tell anyone, so you didn’t tell anyone except the publicist you were hiring (who immediately started positioning you for feature articles), your sales agent (who began positioning you to distributors), your principal cast and all their reps (so they could make plans to be there), and your principal crew. So, essentially…everyone. The couple weeks before the official Sundance announcement it was an open secret about who was going and who wasn’t.

but now, with the big push to take Sundance back to an independent festival, and keep it out of the hands of the agencies and studios…no one knows. A couple of things have gotten out. From what I know, 2 features know they are in, a couple filmmakers who have had films there before have gotten the gentle “no thank you” call…and that’s it. The rest of us will ACTUALLY find out when the rest of the world does.

And it’s killing me.

Sundance isn’t the be all, end all, on the festival circuit, but for a film like ours, it’s probably the best positioning. We are a truly independent production, funded through private equity, starring a great cast who fell in love with the project, and helmed by a first time feature director. It’s dark, and funny, and we have great response from the industry we’ve shown it to.

So, we would normally have heard by now. Either way.

Which, as much as I know the reality of the situation, and the fact that we won’t know until tomorrow (or Thursday if we’re selected for screening but not competition)…brings up the nervousness and insecurities that are just beneath the surface. What if the film isn’t good? What if the performances aren’t what we think? What if, in strategizing to keep it out of the hands of most people until we can announce our festival premiere, we have created an environment so insular we no longer can recognize what the film is?

What if everyone I know is lying, and they’ve all heard about every other film except this one? Or what if they’ve already heard bad news about this one, but don’t want to be the ones to tell us?

And so, I understand that tonight will be a sleepless night for me, with a useless morning until 1pm PST, when announcements are made.

Wish us luck.

So…what now???

November 2nd, 2009

So, after finishing shooting, we went directly into edit. I had some traveling to do, so it’s been a few months of out of town…

Aspen, CO —–>Central Colombia—–>Vegas, NV—–>Paso Robles, CA—–>back to NY—–>VT——> finally home for about 6 weeks!

So for the next six weeks, I will be catching up on everything, including the blog. After all, since I blogged last we have:

1. started the festival submission cycle with A Little Help

2. sold off a project to get it into production

3. gained a reality television agent

4. brought on a small budget film with Pierce Brosnan attached which we are putting the finance together for

5. begun to regroup and plan out our next few projects

Much has happened, and much is happening in the time coming up, so I need to get caught up. Finishing a film is always a time to reassess and come up with the best attack plan for the next year or so. Onward!

Interview time!

August 20th, 2009

When we were shooting, Ken McGorry from POST Magazine asked us for an interview about shooting on RED. This is the first feature I’ve worked on that wasn’t shot on 35mm. Here’s what we had to say:

POST Magazine Interview

It was published in the July issue of POST Magazine, but for some reason, we just got our copies of it!

Be careful what you want!

August 20th, 2009

There are things I love about what I do, and things that are just annoying. On the list of annoying is this time period after a movie wraps production, and your line producer and accountant are no longer employed, BUT it doesn’t yet make sense to bring a post accountant on. (because we are a post house internally, during the offline, there should be literally one check every two weeks to cut…and it doesn’t make much sense to pay someone to do that)

However, there is, invariably some problem with something that crops up that is more involved. And to be honest, I often have to make some value judgements on the worth of my time on if it’s worth fighting over or not. I am not only in the middle of finishing this project, but ramping up on others, and I only have so many hours in a day.

So, for the past few weeks, I have been dealing with one of our actors business managers. She is claiming her actor was underpaid for the two week period. (let me first of all say, she was not…) However, the difference in what the business manager was claiming, and the payment already given was about 800 dollars. I did a couple of calls, and quickly realized that, although I was correct in the payment given, this business manager was about to make my life hell with calls, emails, and trying to get SAG involved. Was it worth it? I came to the conclusion that no, the $800 payment was worth it to make her go away. So, I commenced the payment, and brushed off my hands, thinking it was done.

But, no. The business manager thought that the adjustment wasn’t right, and called our SAG rep to complain. Now, let me say, that we have a great relationship with the unions when it comes to payment. We do all step ups as soon as we are notified, we don’t miss P&H payments, we are responsive to anything that is an actual problem, etc.

So our SAG rep takes a look at everything…and determines that I should CANCEL the additional payment made. We were right in the first place on the payment, and don’t owe anything additional. (which I had told the business manager repeatedly)

Well, there you go. Your client has now lost $800 I was willing to give her, because you decided to escalate.

Happy?

I am, she’s out of my hair now.

Rough Cut!

August 9th, 2009

I am currently holding in my hands the only copy of the rough/director’s first cut of A Little Help. Dropped off at my door late Friday night, I spent Saturday immersed in work far less interesting on an upcoming film project, so I wouldn’t let myself watch it until I got that finished and out the door. Which happend at 4:30am.

So, now I sit, on Sunday afternoon, and get ready to put it in the DVD player. I haven’t seen anything since the assembly stage, letting the editor and the director get to this first cut without me in the room at all.

This moment is a mix of excitement and terror. After all, this is the first look I get at a project which I have been working on for the past 2 1/2 years. I’ve been seeing this film in my mind for that long. Will it live up to the expectations that the dailies have set? Will the jokes and laughs hit as desired? Will it tonally be that fine line of comedy and pathos that we were trying for? The anticipation has made me a little queasy, and I’m writing to calm my stomach down before taking the leap into the next 2 hours. When you spend this much time, energy, and emotion trying to create a film, the idea of seeing a (semi)product is almost overwhelming. What if it’s really, really bad? What if it’s really, really good? Will I even be able to tell which it is after being so closely involved in every step?

It’s sitting in the DVD player as I write this, just waiting for me to finish up and hit play. Cross your fingers everyone…I know I am.

A little bit of wrap up on the production

June 30th, 2009

So, we finished. On time? No, one day over. On budget? sort of. This was a unique budget situation where the budget had a bit of play to expand or contract based on the look of the film. On creative point? absolutely.


I think there is always a lesson (actually more than one, but I think there is always ONE big one) that is invaluable to be learned from every shoot. I have been spending the past week or so contemplating what that one is from this shoot. I’ve been able to easily come up with the small ones (which all hold smaller stories which I will try to illuminate in  future blogs: all top level people need to have done physical production, make your financiers lock to a finite number before pre-production,check every actor’s reputation, if it’s the first time you’ve worked with your keys…be involved in the hiring of their staff also) but the one overarching lesson I should hve learned has been eluding me. and it’s why writing a wrap up blog about this production experience has been delayed.

Then, I woke up in the middle of the night with one phrase on my mind, “intersection of art and commerce”

hmmm…

now, this is a concept that has always been some thing I think is the crux of why I’m involved in the film process. I am essentially an artist who works in a commerce driven society. So, how do you do that? But beyond that, how do you do that responsibly.

My personal lesson on this film is, by making art. See, this film is, by all “industry standards” in subject matter, something that might be a long shot. It’s a mid thirites females lead. It’s not a genre film. It’s something that, when I read the script, I knew I HAD to get made, because it was just so real. And, because of that, as we went into production, the casting fell into place…which made it into a commercially viable project. We have a cast that has no huge names, but runs in good names very deep (Sam McMurray, James Rebhorn, Lesley Ann Warren, Ron Leibman….and that’s outside of our leads)

If you asked me, at the outset, what kind of movies I would be looking to produce, this, at script stage, wouldn’t have been one. But when I read the script, I knew it was something that could make this kind of magic.

So, I’m trying to, in a cynical industry, hold on to this as the lesson from this production. Believe in art. Believe in the writer. Believe your instincts.

p.s. I promise to get to the stories from the other smaller lessons in the next two weeks.

In which about 1/2 of you that don’t know me personally turn against me

May 25th, 2009

So, after the past few weeks, I thought I would take the time to blog about something that continously is coming up on set, and is something that I think everyone in the industry has to look at with an objective eye (which is often difficult to do) the topic? Unions. 

 

Now, before I start this entry, I feel like I need to give my general opinions of unions to put it in context. I think that, overall, the idea of unions came from a very good place, where there needs to be a certain level of protection for workers. And, I think that, in the film industry, unions are an important thing. They make sure that people have specific recourses and remedies in an culture that likes to work people 18 hours a day. While I personally believe in overtime and breaks on shoot days, be they union or non-union, I also know producers that would work people into the ground without recourse or compensation. 

 

BUT…I think that all production and creatives should know why people in my position often disagree with unions. And right now, I can give a specific example. The movie we are shooting is a Tier 1 shoot. That means it’s 2.5 million all in. Low budget. No one is getting paid a lot. You get the picture. But, I (fortunately) have some amazing people working on the movie, because they all think (as I do) that this is the kind of film that will be a breakout hit. All of my department keys are people who do much bigger movies than this, so no one is doing it for the money. But in this industry, if you are the key on a great breakout hit, you get launched up/nominated/etc. So, this little 2.5 mill movie is looking like a 15 mill. 

 

And yet we have a union problem. See, there’s a person who was PLACED on the film. One of our department heads couldn’t find a second who was union (due to the pay on these tier 1 movies) So, instead of letting him hire a non-union person, the union placed a person in the second position. 

 

Which could have been ok. Except that she’s terrible at her job. Due to her lack of performance, whole takes have been ruined, the director has yelled at her, the DP has yelled at her, I have taken her aside to speak to her (I don’t yell…mostly), and I have gotten to the point where I have told her key to fire her. 

 

Except that she’s a legacy. 

 

A legacy? She is fourth generation in this particular union, so her entire family in embroiled in it. So when I sat down with the union to speak with them about it, they told me, that regardless  of her performance, I was not allowed to fire her. No matter what. She could burn down my set…and I could not fire her.

 

This is not what unions were designed to do, and yet it feels indicitive of what they have become. They have gone past the point of protecting basic wage and labor practices, and have become a mafioso group who can force people in a free market economy to do things which are bad for business. 

 

So, now I’m in a position where I have to hire an additional person to do her job, and have banned her from set…so she can work on the trucks if her key so desires, but essentially, she’ll be doing nothing. 

 

Makes me wish we had gone non-union.

In looking back on this week…

May 10th, 2009

 

I realize that the thing I’m proudest of is being called a wunderkind by someone who was one in this industry himself. 

 

I forget, sometimes, that I technically become the boss to people who are much older/have more experience/have worked on more things than me. 

 

So, being told that by one of them made me feel like there was a level of respect which surprised me. I naturally have a high level of respect for them because of who they are and what they have already achieved. I feel lucky to be surrounded by people from whom I get to learn each day.

 

I “get” that I am very young to be in the position I’m in, but I have a suspicion that the fact that I have no ego about it, and am constantly willing to learn from everyone is part of what put me here. 

 

So, for the moment, I’m going to revel in being called that by someone who has achieved more in his 30 years in the industry than most people do in their whole career.

Reasons Not To Be an Actor

May 7th, 2009

 

Keeping in mind it was the way I made my living for a good couple of years, after spending so much time on the other side of the table, I could never go back to the life of an auditioning actor. Why? Here’s a list of things we have said about the actors we’ve seen over the past few weeks. Keep in mind, these are the actors who have made it to the producer/director’s session…so they were already a winnowed group. 

 

  • not funny. could never be funny.
  • who thought that girl was pretty? bad choice. 
  • 35? Has not aged well.
  • We’d call her a meeskite
  • too pretty
  • terrible voice
  • can’t we get a name for this part?
  • he’s too much of a name for this part!
  • Why aren’t we seeing any chubby girls for this?

 

So, for any of the people out there thinking that it’s about how well you do in an audition…after you pass a certain bar of competence in the room…these are the things that keep you from getting the job, or give you the job. 

 

But one day, the producers and director will be looking for exactly you. And that’s when it will happen. ;-)