Archive for August, 2009

Hello baaaaaby!

August 27th, 2009

So, one of the reasons that I enjoy blogging is that I like having the opportunity to speak  my mind sometimes spontaneously about what is happening…and other times to give a bit more thought to it before I write it down.

And I like the option for all y’all to not know exactly which it is.

Right now I am thinking very deeply about being female in the industry, what that means, and what advantages it affords me.

You’ll notice I didn’t say disadvantages.

See, I don’t believe that there is a specific female disadvantage at anything (unless it is physically based. No, I can’t bench press what my male collegues can (but I can outrun them!)). It’s more that females refuse to understand their advantages, and use them to level the playing field.

I will say-unilaterally- you should always have (at least) one woman on the top level team. Why? Because it immediately breaks through the male dick wagging in a different way. It just…does. And if you’re going to call me sexist for saying that, well then so be it.

This is not my first industry I’ve been successful in. It’s not my first male dominated industry I’ve been successful in. It is, however, the first time I’ve been acutely aware of women crying out to be treated as equals. I don’t know if that is a difference in the industry, or in my awareness…I just know that I hear it now. And I hear it as grating nails on a chalkboard.

Wow! I get it! That sounds harsh!

Or, perhaps, it sounds just like most people hear those whinings.

See, I’ve never found any barriers based on that. But I’ve repeatedly seen women fall down because they won’t work 16 hour days for 10 years like men do. They have to take time out to put boyfriends in front of their work. And what is the dropout ratio of men vs women in the industry? Based just on my past experience with assistants and subordinates, I would always put my bet on men being in it for the long haul.

WAIT! Am I really being that harsh on women? Do I think we are destined to fail in the business world? No way. I just think we have to be realistic, because not being realistic hurts all of us.

Look around you at your 5 closest girlfriends. How many of them…honestly…if they married someone wealthy would want to leave the job they do? Or take it down to part time? or need to make some adjustments to schedule? Or take a lower paying job to do something more fufilling?  What about once they had a kid?

How would it change? Honestly? Not your idealized version of how it changes, but honestly.

We, as women, can stand here and say we are no different…but that’s a lie. It just…is.

These are realities that, as an employer, I deal with. And I have to place my bets on the people that make the most sense for me long term. Now, not that women don’t make sense to hire, but I (and they) have to understand the strategic advantages we afford.

Wait  a minute, Wait a minute, Wait a minute (as Eddie Murphy in Coming to America would say). Wasn’t this blog started out with the idea of “It’s more that females refuse to understand their advantages, and use them to level the playing field.”?

Why, yes! it was.

See, we have, overall, a way of breaking through barriers that men do not. A natural empathy that allows us to figure out other people’s needs. And, if you look at it, most of business is simply figuring out other people’s needs and meeting those needs. The cook that makes everyone forget they’re not eating steak because the stroganoff is so good is exercising the same skills that we can use in the boardroom.

And, women need to understand the dynamic we have with men. We are not the same. We can convince them, annoy them, press them, entice them, and beguile them in subtly different ways.

So, with all your intelligence and experience, take it and use it in your female way to get to the top.

Guys need you there.

Interview time!

August 20th, 2009

When we were shooting, Ken McGorry from POST Magazine asked us for an interview about shooting on RED. This is the first feature I’ve worked on that wasn’t shot on 35mm. Here’s what we had to say:

POST Magazine Interview

It was published in the July issue of POST Magazine, but for some reason, we just got our copies of it!

Be careful what you want!

August 20th, 2009

There are things I love about what I do, and things that are just annoying. On the list of annoying is this time period after a movie wraps production, and your line producer and accountant are no longer employed, BUT it doesn’t yet make sense to bring a post accountant on. (because we are a post house internally, during the offline, there should be literally one check every two weeks to cut…and it doesn’t make much sense to pay someone to do that)

However, there is, invariably some problem with something that crops up that is more involved. And to be honest, I often have to make some value judgements on the worth of my time on if it’s worth fighting over or not. I am not only in the middle of finishing this project, but ramping up on others, and I only have so many hours in a day.

So, for the past few weeks, I have been dealing with one of our actors business managers. She is claiming her actor was underpaid for the two week period. (let me first of all say, she was not…) However, the difference in what the business manager was claiming, and the payment already given was about 800 dollars. I did a couple of calls, and quickly realized that, although I was correct in the payment given, this business manager was about to make my life hell with calls, emails, and trying to get SAG involved. Was it worth it? I came to the conclusion that no, the $800 payment was worth it to make her go away. So, I commenced the payment, and brushed off my hands, thinking it was done.

But, no. The business manager thought that the adjustment wasn’t right, and called our SAG rep to complain. Now, let me say, that we have a great relationship with the unions when it comes to payment. We do all step ups as soon as we are notified, we don’t miss P&H payments, we are responsive to anything that is an actual problem, etc.

So our SAG rep takes a look at everything…and determines that I should CANCEL the additional payment made. We were right in the first place on the payment, and don’t owe anything additional. (which I had told the business manager repeatedly)

Well, there you go. Your client has now lost $800 I was willing to give her, because you decided to escalate.

Happy?

I am, she’s out of my hair now.

Rough Cut!

August 9th, 2009

I am currently holding in my hands the only copy of the rough/director’s first cut of A Little Help. Dropped off at my door late Friday night, I spent Saturday immersed in work far less interesting on an upcoming film project, so I wouldn’t let myself watch it until I got that finished and out the door. Which happend at 4:30am.

So, now I sit, on Sunday afternoon, and get ready to put it in the DVD player. I haven’t seen anything since the assembly stage, letting the editor and the director get to this first cut without me in the room at all.

This moment is a mix of excitement and terror. After all, this is the first look I get at a project which I have been working on for the past 2 1/2 years. I’ve been seeing this film in my mind for that long. Will it live up to the expectations that the dailies have set? Will the jokes and laughs hit as desired? Will it tonally be that fine line of comedy and pathos that we were trying for? The anticipation has made me a little queasy, and I’m writing to calm my stomach down before taking the leap into the next 2 hours. When you spend this much time, energy, and emotion trying to create a film, the idea of seeing a (semi)product is almost overwhelming. What if it’s really, really bad? What if it’s really, really good? Will I even be able to tell which it is after being so closely involved in every step?

It’s sitting in the DVD player as I write this, just waiting for me to finish up and hit play. Cross your fingers everyone…I know I am.

Hey You! Lady in the Back!

August 3rd, 2009

A couple days ago, I went to the “Not a Premiere Because You Can’t Call It a Premiere If You’re Sending It To Festivals, So Let’s All Dress Up And Call It a Cast, Crew and Industry Screening” of a film which two of my friends have been working on for quite a bit of time. It’s her first foray into producing, and his directing debut. The setting was pretty standard. Everyone showed up at the appointed time at the fabulous Rialto Theater, milled about the lobby making small talk, filed into the theater, watched, and then afterwards the cast and crew went up on stage for a short Q&A.

Things were going along nicely, with them discussing how they had to run and gun a lot of scenes (this was an ultra low budget, so luxuries like permits weren’t used), how they did the research for the bio-pic part of it, etc. Then some lady in the back stands up.

“Uhm, I just had a comment about the scene in the park. There are some modern cars driving behind you.”

Oh, yeah, did I mention that the filmmakers made a period piece? A no budget period piece? A no budget period piece set in the 1920s? Where the producer and director were also acting as m/u, hair, wardrobe, and countless other hats?

So, were did a couple of modern cars drive through the way background in one scene? Yes. But the point, I think, is much bigger than that.

Shut the f&*k up.

I have heard people make statements like this, and ask loaded questions to try to throw filmmakers at every level of screening. Why is it, that in a Q&A situation, people lose simple human kindness? It’s as if the schadenfreude of person asking the question can’t stand the fact that the people on stage completed a project, and has to find a way to tear them down. Up on the stage were six people who had put countless hours, their own money, and a ton of creative energy into a project that, overall, looked good. But, even if it HADN’T looked good, the time and place to bring up errors isn’t here. This was to celebrate their work.

Look, was the film perfect? no. Do the filmmakers think it’s perfect? no. But what good does pointing out that car do? The budget isn’t there to digitally take it out. It’s there, it’s in the background, it’s going to stay.

So, how about we all agree that if you need to tear someone down just to tear someone down, you stay out of the artistic community? We’re all fighting every day to create work we’re proud of, and that’s just not helping anyone.

By the way, rude lady, I don’t see you having a “Not a Premiere Because You Can’t Call It a Premiere If You’re Sending It To Festivals, So Let’s All Dress Up And Call It a Cast, Crew and Industry Screening” today. So enjoy this one.